Keep Your Profiles Updated

plaxo-profile-imageI had a significant change in my life on December 31, 2009, as that was the day my family and I sold off our ownership positions in SOAR Communications to my former business partner.

Interestingly, it didn’t hit me until two days ago that I needed to make changes to all of my various public Internet-based profiles (and biographies) to accurately reflect my new reality. Which leads to the point of this blog post:

When was the last time you reviewed and/or updated your public profiles (and/or bios)?

For me, it had been WAY TOO LONG.

In taking a personal accounting, I realized I’ve got profiles on

on two blogs/Websites:

So I’ve now started that process (as shown in the photo above), and I plan to spend this morning reviewing and updating ALL of my public profiles/biographies.

And if you haven’t done so lately, I recommend you do the same:

Review and update each of your public profiles and biographies today.

I’m going to add this as a once-a-quarter task to my calendar to make sure I stay on top of this task in the future. I hope you do so too.

Becoming a Better Writer

becoming-a-better-writer

What makes a good writer? What is it about a blog post, story, letter or column that makes it engaging, that makes someone want to continue reading? How can I become a better writer?

If you’re in the public relations, marketing, investor relations and/or strategic communications world, perhaps you’ve already asked yourself these or similar questions. I know I have.

The snap answer, of course,  is to write. I’ve heard and read that answer more than 100 times — “If you want to be a better writer then you have to write.”

Okay, duh! But in my experience writing alone is not enough, especially if you’re not a particularly good writer to begin with.

I believe that the most important part of improving your skills as a writer, to becoming a better writer, is to have a good editor (or a good teacher, as the case may be).

In other words, I want someone who is better than me looking over my metaphorical shoulder prompting, prodding and pointing out specific examples of how and where I can improve my writing.

This point was brought back home to me this morning when a long-time friend asked me to review something he had written, and for the record, he told me I could “let him have it from every angle.” So here, in part, is what I wrote to my friend.

Most of the time when I read, I’m looking for new information, a new perspective, a twist on something I already understand, or perhaps an update. This is particularly true for items I read (or consume), if you’d like to use that term.
 
When it comes to reading for entertainment, however, my goals are different. I typically want to be transported off to a place in my mind where I can escape reality. Sometimes I’m looking to enjoy a new reality, to live what someone else has lived, to experience what they have experienced.
 
I don’t know if this helps or not, but hopefully it does.
 
In my experience of writing my “Utah Tech Watch” column for ~10 years, I found that I typically needed 600 words minimum to craft and tell a story. More often, however, that word count was closer to 800 words.
 
Certainly stories can be told in less space than 600-800 words, but that was the sweet spot I was asked to hit each week by my main editor (Barbara Rattle at The Enterprise), and most of the time, I hit it.
 
When I was outside of that word length, 90% of the time it was because I needed more space to tell a story (or perhaps I was just too lazy to write more compactly and concisely), or I needed to edit better.
 
So . . . my advice to you? Shoot for 600-800 words for each item. Look to weave into each piece something
  •  
    • new,
    • unexpected,
    • controversial,
    • insightful,
    • thought-provoking or
    • out-of-the-ordinary.
 If you do, I believe you’ll be on your way to becoming a better writer and crafting pieces that will grab readers by the throat, heart or mind.

Are the items I mention above hard and fast rules? Of course not.

But I know they helped me to become a better writer - that and having a good editor. ;-)

Betty Benton Mann, the “Betty” Behind the Betty Factor, Died Friday Morning

Betty Mann (of "The Betty Factor" fame)

Betty Mann (of "The Betty Factor" fame)

Betty Benton Mann, my 83-year-old mother-in-law and the inspiration behind The Betty Factor, died in her sleep early Friday morning, December 4, 2009 of health matters incident to old age and having her gall bladder removed earlier in the week.

Here is a copy of her obituary.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

After 83 wonderful years on earth, Betty Benton Mann returned home to her Father-in-Heaven, the Savior, Jesus Christ, many loving family members and friends, and her beloved husband, Ray, on December 4, 2009, nearly two years to the day after Ray’s passing.

Born July 3, 1926 in Boise, Idaho to Mamie Thompson and Otto G. Benton, Betty was the fifth of nine children. She was raised in Boise, Twin Falls, Idaho and Redondo Beach, California.

From the day she first walked herself to services as a young child, Betty was a devout member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS). As a teenager, she was president of her ward Golden Gleaner organization and helped plan and run the first ever LDS Youth Conference in southern California.

After graduating from Redondo Union High School, she moved to North Salt Lake to help her oldest sister, Wanda, care for her children, and it was there that she met her future husband, Ray Elwood Mann.

Betty and Ray were married in the Salt Lake Temple of the LDS church on May 4, 1948. They settled in Bountiful, Utah where they raised three daughters and two sons, while she also worked as a dental assistant for many years. Betty was active in the PTA in Bountiful where she ran the Halloween Carnival for three years and served as PTA president for two year.

After their youngest children graduated from high school in 1975, Betty and Ray spent an adventurous year in 1976 in West Germany for Ray’s employer, Chicago Bridge & Iron. The next year, Ray was transferred to world headquarters in Chicago where they lived until 1984. During their time in Naperville, Illinois, Betty filled an eight-year volunteer assignment with LDS Social Services working with out-of-wedlock mothers, including service as a counselor to birth mothers and transporting newborns to adoptive parents. She also served for a time as a member of the Relief Society presidency in the Glenbard Ward in Illinois.

Betty and Ray moved to Sandy, Utah in 1984 where they made their home for the rest of their lives. In Sandy, Betty served for 18 years in the LDS church’s Data Entry Program in the Canyon View Stake. She and Ray also served a one-year LDS Service Mission in 1994 near Bakersfield, California for the Home Management Department.

Betty was preceded in death by her parents, five siblings, her husband, and one son, Clyde. She is survived by four children, Linda, Pam (Harold) Egginton, Todd, and Allisha (David) Politis; 18 grandchildren (evenly divided between boys and girls); and 14 great-grandchildren.

A viewing will be held at Mountain View Mortuary at 3115 East 7800 South in Cottonwood Heights, Utah from 6 to 8 p.m. on Tues., Dec. 8, 2009. The funeral will be held at the same location at 11 a.m. on Wed., Dec. 9, preceded by an additional viewing from 9:45 a.m. to 10:45 a.m. Interment, on site, will follow immediately after the funeral.

The family extends its heartfelt thanks and admiration for all of the fantastic doctors and medical providers who worked with Betty in addressing her health concerns during the past few years. In addition, Betty (and Ray) loved living at South Towne Ranch in Sandy, Utah where they made many wonderful friends.

Betty had a sharp mind and wit her entire life, and she loved studying the gospel of Jesus Christ and learning about LDS church history. She was a devoted and loving wife, mother, grandmother, great-grandmother and friend, and although she will be missed, we are happy she has “graduated” from this life to be reunited with her husband and best friend, Ray.

Goodbye for now, Betty.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Although we had some initial son-in-law / mother-in-law challenges early in the 28 years of our relationship, we both grew to love and respect each other over time, and I’m grateful Allisha and I were able to have both Betty and Ray live so close by as we raised our five children.

She was a good person and taught me much, not the least of which was to always remember to work and work and work to make sure what I wrote could be easily understood by anyone, even my mother-in law. ;-)

To that end, I will always use the phrase “The Betty Factor” as a shorthand reminder of that lesson. I will also keep this blog alive in her honor and as a way of continuing to teach about the importance of keeping all marketing messages simple and on-point.

Thank you, Betty, and for now, goodbye. 

Getting Back to Writing

This weekend, I took my wife, Allisha, to go see the new movie, Julie & Julia. mastering-the-art-of-french-cooking-photo

This fun, funny, heart-warming and life-reaffirming film covers the yearlong journey of discovery young wife Julie Powell takes as she sets out to produce in 365 days the 536 recipes found in Julia Child’s cooking tome: Mastering the Art of French Cooking.

For the record, it was a completely delightful movie (yeah, not necessarily a very manly adjective to use to describe a film, but apropos nonetheless), and I highly recommend this movie to everyone.

What I especially liked about Julie & Julia was that I walked out of the theatre feeling energized and hopeful about life and convinced more than ever that I made a wonderful decision nearly 28 years ago in choosing to marry the young lady who has since become my best friend.

Julie & Julia also reminded me once again of the importance of the career-choosing message I learned from Mormon educator and philosopher, Truman Madsen, when he delivered a brown bag luncheon presentation in the Wilkinson Center at Brigham Young University many, many years ago:

  1. Choose something you’re good at.
  2. Choose something you enjoy.
  3. Choose a career you can support your family with while making a difference in the world.

Turns out my best grades as a directionless sophomore/junior were in Mass Communications, which also happened to be the classes I enjoyed the most. And now, close to 30 years later, I am deep into a career that spans more than 25 years and regularly finds me helping clients of all types successfully

  • deploy public relations campaigns,
  • unleash social media programs,
  • support stock valuations, and
  • sell more goods and services.

As it turns out, I ab-so-lute-ly love what I do! And I am blessed beyond measure by the good Lord above with several gifts that make me quite good at this career.

Which brings me to the point of today’s blog post.

It’s hard to imagine, but it’s now been more than four months (April 11, 2009) since I’ve written anything new on The Betty Factor. Four months! UGH!

Naturally, April 11 is just about the same time that Politis Communications lost two clients and saw a third client cut its PR budget by two-thirds. Yes, it was awful. Although we had been holding on through the toughest economic downturn that this country has seen since the Great Depression, it’s been a hard couple of months, culminating with the tough decision to let three employees at the end of June (2 full-time and 1 part-time).

As a result, I’ve focused almost all of my professional efforts of late on pursuing prospective new clients. And I’m grateful to say that we’ve been fortunate to land a couple of new projects recently and appear to be on the verge of landing several contracts as well, which is great!

Nevertheless, to circle back to Julie & Julia for a moment, watching that movie also reminded me how much I love writing. It’s been in my blood ever since I was in the 3rd Grade and wrote a take-off on Creature from the Black Lagoon, that campy 1954 SciFi/Horror flick I first watched in the early 60s.

creature-from-the-black-lagoon-promophotoI’ve also been reminded recently how much I enjoy getting down in the trenches to work with clients, craft strategic plans, roll out campaigns, pitch story ideas to journalists, and see concepts become reality.

That said, I feel re-energized and I am recommitting to write regularly here within the four digital walls of TheBettyFactor.com.

I don’t plan to write every day, and I suspect I will mostly be writing after hours or on the weekends, but I am going to write. And I’m going to do so about my professional passions, especially as it relates to the premise of The Betty Factor — identifying and writing about the best and worst examples I can find from all areas of marketing and marketing communications.

That’s it. Thanks for reading.

And if you haven’t seen it yet, I do recommend Julie & Julia.

David

P.S.  Anyone out there looking for great PR, IR and/or marketing communications consulting and/or services, feel free to contact me at dpolitis@politis.com, 801-523-3730 xt. 11, or 801-556-8184(cell). I’d love to visit.  ;-)

The TechCrunch Manifesto

Posted on December 18th, 2008 @ 20:33 pm by Beldin.
Categories: In the News, Journalism, Public Relations, blogging.
the-techcrunch-manifesto

The PR/Journo — Sharks and Jets — fight just went another round thanks to everybody’s favorite tech blogger Michael Arrington. Michael is no newcomer to slamming down the PR industry. The problem with this back and forth, I believe, is that it’s more about egos than actually fixing a problem — and that’s on both sides of this little war 2.0.

No one likes to be told what they’re doing is wrong, that’s a fact. And changing the behavior of an industry takes a lot more than a vicious, embarrassing blog post by a journalist/blogger. While it seems cliche to say, the only thing constant these days is change. We are all learning, both on the PR side and the journalist side. The lines have blurred, however, because there are a lot of bloggers who get the online media tools a lot better than some journalists and therefore become a very visible, vocal minority for the journalism field.

A discussion that has still not been put to rest: Are bloggers journalists? The answer, I think is yes, but it depends. Do I consider TechCrunch journalists, sure, they report the news in a timely fashion, while they are subjective, that’s why I read blogs, and that’s the difference between a blog and a newspaper. But the heart of story finding and reporting are both present in blogs. I like working with bloggers, they usually are more down to earth, and more open to building a relationship. But, this latest tirade by Arrington leads me to question my stance on whether I can/should lump bloggers in with journalists.

Arrington’s antics include the announcement that his tech news site, TechCrunch, will no longer honor NDAs and embargoes. Wow! Talk about killing a fly with an axe. This is really too bad, because it creates a couple problems for journalists, PR peeps and companies trying to get coverage:

  • TechCrunch is a huge site, and has a tremendous following. How many PR peeps or companies will think twice before offering TechCrunch exclusives.
  • TechCrunch’s stance gives the journos a bad image. Let’s be honest, NDAs have been broken, but to outright say that one will give his/her word and then break it, come on! There are a lot of good journalists who are willing to honor these agreements because it’s good for them, their publication and their readers.
  • Trust is a huge part of the relationship between PR peeps, companies and journalists. Throwing that out will create a very chaotic, back-stabbing environment and no one will prosper — not TechCrunch, not anybody.

Sure, we can all do a better job.

But I think this response is ridiculous. I understand Michael’s frustration. How about on the PR side? When a blogger or journalist breaks an embargo, we look bad too, and it hurts our relationships as well. But taking the low road is always wrong. Honestly, I’d rather a reporter tell me “no, I won’t honor embargoes,” and show some integrity, than to lie about it.

This is a problem to which I don’t know if there is a simple solution. I can’t control what other PR peeps do any better than Michael can control how well his competitors enforce embargoes. But I do know that this is a foolish stance to take. I think the bigger company has the bigger responsibility. I also think this needs to be an ongoing discussion, PR folks obviously benefit from the media, and if I’m doing my job right, the media benefits from what I’m doing — whether I pitch the story, or just put the facts and info out there to be found.

Here’re what others in the industry have said about the No Embargo Manifesto:

Fantastic, thanks a lot. Besides being dishonest and douchebaggy in a purely human sense, it is basically a Hobbesian rebellion against the social contract and industry norms that we all follow for our own good. If everyone keeps the embargo, everybody–including the reader–wins. If one publication, acting in self interest, breaks embargoes as a matter of policy, everybody loses, including the rebelling publication.

~Kyle Monson, Web Editor at PC Mag

And this,

But in this bruising contest, TechCrunch clearly does not dominate, based on its size, as it did with the easier press release exclusives. In the new environment, in fact, tiny little voices that are accurate and insightful have just as much impact.

So, my takeaway from Arrington’s rant could be boiled down to three words: “GIVE ME EXCLUSIVES!”

~Kara Swisher, BoomTown

Michael is definitely outspoken, and while I don’t agree with his choice to blatantly violate embargoes, I do think savvy PR minds should weigh in.

What are your thoughts?

Want Better Results? Write Better Headlines!

Regardless of the specific industry you work in, everyone is always looking for ways to be more successful and generate better results. For those of us with marketing and/or communications responsibilities, that means getting more people to read, listen to and/or watch our stuff.

Why? Because the more people we can engage with our marketing/communications stuff the more successful we will be and that invariably means MONEY!

A pile of cash!

So if you really want better results, that means writing better headlines . . . at least that’s what MarketingSherpa says.

MarketingSherpa is one of the leading publishers of information and data on what really works in all areas of marketing and marketing communications. They have hundreds of thousands of subscribers to their free online newsletters, and do a substantial business in selling reports and studies and producing conferences around the U.S.

Last week, MarketingSherpa.com ran a great story in their online newsletter titled “4 Takeaways from MarketingSherpa’s Newsletter Subject-Line Analysis.” (Not necessarily the snappiest headline, but it does follow one of the four rules. See below.)

In summary, MarketingSherpa had their own people go back and analyze every headline for every article they had published in the last year to see if they could identify which articles were the most successful. Naturally, each article topic stands on its own and one topic may be inherently more interesting and/or relevant to more people than the rest.

But by the time they were all done - particularly analyzing click-to-opens (the number of people who clicked on a link to see an entire article) and reviewing clickthroughs (the number of times people clicked on a link within, or connected to, an article) - they came up with Four Takeaways, namely

  1. The first two words in any headline are the most critical (such as How To, Top 12, Simple Email, and HTML vs, among others),
  2. Use “trigger words” in your headlines (you’ll need to read this one because there isn’t a simple rule to follow, but they did suggest you “dedicate at least a few hours to the subject line“),
  3. Avoid hard-sell headlines or headlines that ask for reader action (NOTE: The worst performing 10 headlines for MarketingSherpa last year ALL USED HARD-SELL LANGUAGE OR REQUESTED READER ACTION), and
  4. Use “hot brands” in headlines wherever possible and practical (headlines that included company names like Facebook, Google and Wikipedia pulled the best for MarketingSherpa articles).

They also came up with a BONUS TAKEAWAY, which is

  • Shorter headlines are ALMOST ALWAYS better (but there are exceptions, and MarketingSherpa provides a few examples).

This article has really inspired me to work smarter, harder and longer (when necessary) when it comes to writing any headline.

I believe that anyone who is focused on following the principles of The Betty Factor will do the same.

Do Blogs Influence Purchase Decisions? BuzzLogic Research Study says “Yes!”

Posted on November 11th, 2008 @ 10:42 am by David Politis.
Categories: Marketing, blogging, new media, social media.
do-blogs-influence-purchase-decisions-buzzlogic-research-study-says-yes

Although Wired magazine may believe that blogging is dead (see “Twitter, Flickr, Facebook Make Blogs Look So 2004“), consumers haven’t apparently gotten the memo.

In fact, the results from a recently released study sponsored by BuzzLogic shows that blogs have a significant influence on purchasing decisions. (See “Study” Blogging’s Dead? Someone Forgot to Tell Readers.” and the BuzzLogic news release summarizing the research results.)

Key findings from the BuzzLogic research across 2,000 online consumers?

  • 50 percent of blog readers find blogs useful for purchase information;
  • 52 percent of blog readers said that blogs played a role at the critical moment when they decided to move forward with a purchase; and
  • 40 percent of blog readers say they have taken action based upon seeing an ad on a blog.

Additionally, consumers also said that reading blogs helped them

  • Decide on a product or service (21 percent);
  • Refine choices (19 percent);
  • Get support or answers (19 percent); and
  • Discover products and services (17 percent).

Naturally, I recognize that I’m writing about some of the benefits of having a blog within my own blog post (kinda like a self-fulfilling prophecy.) But just because I’m using this medium doesn’t make the research findings any less important or useful.

If you (or your organization) don’t have a blog, start one! Today!

If you have a blog, make sure you’re adding to your blog on a regular basis.

Promote your blog regularly via social media tools/services, email, and other more traditional marketing and sales vehicles.

And don’t just take my word for it - research backs up this premise: Blogging pays for itself! 

The Role of Social Media in Branding Efforts

the-role-of-social-media-in-branding-efforts

My friend Jason Kintzler (@PitchEngine) - founder of Pitch Engine and overall social media junkie - started a personal blog the other day called New Media Cowboy and launched it with a post entitled “Social Media is Branding.”

Kintzler’s post reminded me that many internal branding efforts are misdirected at best because they’re caught up in the old world way of marketing-think: Specifically, “I (the big, important marketing executive) will tell you (the lucky consumer) what to think about and how to act toward my brand (be it product, service or organization).

This approach is so bass-ackwards it’s laughable, and yet it’s still the way many companies attempt to brand themselves, their products and/or services.

In reality, the definition of a brand has always been directed by those on the receiving ends of any and all communication and marketing efforts and NOT by those on the sending end.

It’s like my very first communications professor at BYU said: “You cannot not communicate.”

In other words, everything we do or say is a form of communication (or marketing, if you will). But since an effective form of mind control has not yet been invented (thank goodness), we cannot control how others will perceive such communication efforts.

Hence, communication has NEVER been a one-way street; rather (at a minimum) communication is a two-way thoroughfare (marketing too). And it is the perception of those receiving any marketing message that determines the brand of an organization, a product, a service or person and NOT the other way around.

“The perception of those receiving any marketing message determines (one’s) brand . . . NOT the other way around.”

That’s what intrigued me about Jason’s post.

He suggests that social media and the tools/services that make up social networking efforts are in fact branding efforts at their very core because they’re all about two-way communication and engaging individuals with one’s organization, product, service or person.

The reason why this observation is so critical is that the best customers are not just repeat customers - they’re evangelizers. They tell others about their great experiences with your brand and as a result they expand your sales, marketing and communications efforts many, many fold.

Why? Because they’re not on your payroll; they’re independent from your organization. As a result, what they write, say and/or do has a HUGE CREDIBILITY - often times generating more impact than virtually any other thing that you might attempt.

Kintzler’s right - social media is ALL ABOUT BRANDING. 

This is a very important concept to grasp and it should flavor any social networking effort undertaken by every marketing, PR, new media and/or communications pro from this point forward.

Blogs vs Traditional Journalism: Are Lines Being Blurred?

Posted on July 16th, 2008 @ 12:51 pm by Bacon.
Categories: Debate, In the News, Journalism, blogging.

According to some bloggers,and traditional media/journalists the Associated Press (AP) is trying to change it’s style.

If the new AP boss in Washington has his way, gone are the days were journalistic writing stays objective and covers both sides of an issue, and new are the days where emotive language and first person writing become the norm.

My first response after reading this news was that true journalistic integrity will be ruined if personal feelings, which many already speculate are clouding good media judgement, interfere with an accurate portrayal of the news. However, after reading a separate article from Ragan’s Daily Headlines it became clear that a lot of bloggers were up in arms about the announcement, which made me wonder why. (more…)

Blogging about Blogging

Posted on July 3rd, 2008 @ 12:02 pm by Beldin.
Categories: Interactive, Web 2.0, blogging, social media.
blogging-about-blogging

Starting and then maintaining a blog can be challenging if you haven’t thought through a couple of important questions:

1. What should I blog about, and

2. How often should I blog

    Jon Greer, author of BNET’s Catching Flack blog has some great points and additional links for business owners looking to start their own blog.

    Read Jon’s original blog post on BNET