Tiger Woods Sets New Crisis Communications Standard

Posted on February 19th, 2010 @ 12:55 pm by David Politis.
Categories: Crisis Communications, Media Relations, Public Relations, Publicity.
Golfer Tiger Woods at press conference 19 February 2010. (Photo courtesy of Getty Images).

Golfer Tiger Woods at press conference 19 February 2010. (Photo courtesy of Getty Images).

Although he waited three months to publicly address the rumors and allegations of marital fidelity, Tiger Woods today set a new Crisis Communications standard for others to follow. (Here’s a link to Tiger’s complete statement.)

Here’s what Tiger did well:

  • The press conference was held in a public forum open to the media.
  • He controlled the environment (no questions were allowed).
  • He admitted his mistakes (he stated clearly the he “was unfaithful”).
  • He apologized for his actions — to his wife, family, employees, partners, the PGA, the PGA Commissioner, his fellow golfers and fans.
  • He said he was sorry (multiple times).
  • He called himself out: “I was wrong. I was foolish. I don’t get to play by different rules.
  • He called his behavior “irresponsible” and “selfish.”
  • He explained that he has been in “in-patient therapy” receiving treatment (treatment that he will return to tomorrow).
  • He chastized the paparazzi for chasing his kids and the media for disclosing the location of his 2 1/2-year-old daughter’s school.
  • He also strongly stated that his wife Elin had “never hit” him on “that night or any other night” — that “There has never been an episode of domestic violence in our marriage, ever” — and that “Elin deserves praise, not blame.”
  • He strongly denied allegations of using performance-enhancing drugs.
  • And he asked that someday those who had believed in him in the past “to one day believe in me again.

Here’s what Tiger did NOT do well:

  • He waited almost two months before addressing the public and media.

That’s it, seriously. I think he did quite well today.

Now . . . the proof will be in the pudding:

  1. How long before Tiger plays golf again professionally? (If he plays in the Masters, will today’s apology be seen as sincere? Does he need to take all of 2010 off from golf? Personally, I think not, but that’s me.)
  2. Will he and Elin be able to reconcile?
  3. Will Tiger be able to stay faithful? {Hopefully, he understands that he now has a Gary Hart-like target taped squarely on his back and journalists of all types will be looking to catch him straying again.}
  4. Will he do anything to try and provide a level of public restitution, a penance if you will, such as a donation to a non-profit that supports abandoned wives and families?

But these questions and more are queries for the future.

For now, I believe that Tiger Woods (and his public relations team) have set a new standard for issuing a public apology in a Crisis Communications setting.

2 comments.

Comment on February 19th, 2010.

He did a pretty dang good job at covering all the bases. I think his best move now is to continue forward with his career.

The sooner he can give the press something else (more positive) to focus on, the faster he can put this mess behind him, and hopefully repair his life out of view of the scrutinizing eyes of the press.

Comment on February 19th, 2010.

Interesting perspective, Nate. Go back in to rehab for awhile, work on relationship with Elin, then get back out on the golf course and get the media reporting on Tiger’s golf game. Probably not bad advice.

Leave a comment

TheBettyFactor.com is intended to discuss marcomm topics as well as highlight the best and critique the worst of marketing communications. It’s meant as a dialogue to raise the standards of the industry. In that light, here are the few, simple policies for commenting on this blog:
  • Keep it clean: No profane, vulgar, suggestive or obscene language, please. We’re communicators here. That kind of language just shows a lack of professionalism.
  • Keep it civil: Be polite and sensitive to others. Insulting or slandering anyone, directly or indirectly, will not be tolerated.
  • Keep it applicable: This blog has a purpose: a discussion of the best and worst in marketing communications to increase the standards of the profession. Please stick to it.
Other than that, let’s have a conversation.

Names and email addresses are required (email addresses aren't displayed), url's are optional.

Comments may contain the following xhtml tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>