Deseret News Cuts 34 Positions as Ad Revenues Fall 32%

Posted on July 9th, 2008 @ 22:09 pm by David Politis.
Categories: In the News, Journalism, Marketing, Media Relations, Public Relations.
deseret-news-cuts-34-positions-as-ad-revenues-fall-32

The Deseret News (the daily newspaper started more than 150 years ago by Brigham Young), has eliminated 34 editorial positions in a cost-cutting move following a 32 percent in advertising revenues since January 2008.

According to Paul Beebe’s story in today’s Salt Lake Tribune (the cross-town and cultural rival of the DNews), the Deseret News had had 200 journalists on its staff, which was pared down through layoffs, buyouts and attrition.

As part of the cutbacks, the DNews will no longer publish a separate edition in Utah County, arguably the most conservative county in the state that bears the nickname of “Happy Valley.” The paper will, however, continue to staff a pared back bureau in Utah County (currently based in Orem near the top of the so-called “diagonal,” the stretch of 1200 North that drops into Provo from the plot of land housing University Mall).

The DNews has, however, closed is bureau in Washington, D.C. It will also do away with its standalone business section, which will be moved into its “first” or A section of the paper.

According to Cision’s MediaSource, the Deseret News has a Sunday circulation of slightly more than 75,000, while the Tribune has nearly double that number of Sunday subscribers at 143,000.

Interestingly, the DNews now has 164 journalists on staff, while today’s Salt Lake Tribune article says the SLTrib has a ”staff of 170 people.”

Whether the Trib’s 170 staff members are all journalists or not, I think it’s fascinating to learn that at worst the staffing levels for the two newspapers are virtually identical, particularly when one considers the disparity between the circulation figures.

Interestingly, the DNews’ circulation numbers have held steady during the past couple of years. Not steady enough apparently to warrant having nearly double the staff for comparable circluation levels at the Tribune. 

The impact of such cutbacks should be clear to public relations and marketing professionals: Fewer journalists means fewer opportunities to pitch/place stories. It also means more work for the remaining staff members.

This is not just a Utah story, however, as newspapers around the globe are facing growing and ongoing revenue pressures as more and more advertisers allocate more ad dollars to the online world and away from such tradtional media properties as newspapers.

By all accounts, the Deseret News and Salt Lake Tribune have fared relatively well in this realm. (Cision research suggests that the Trib attracts nearly 600,000 unique visitors per month to its online editions; it has no such figures for the DNews.)

Regardless, many people still get their daily news fix from the morning paper. Unfortunately, getting a story placed in the 2nd greatest circulation paper in Utah just got a bit harder.

7 comments.

Comment on July 9th, 2008.

Wow. Really, I am shocked. It’s interesting too because on all accounts DNews looked like they were succeeding online. This begs the question, since this isn’t the first news entity effected by online publications, how healthy is the Trib?

Paul Jones
Comment on July 10th, 2008.

David, I’m sorta inclined to agree that pitching will get harder. But as a newspaper reader I’m more worried that neither paper is going to figure out this Internet conundrum in time. I suspect both the Trib and D-News will retrench and run more wire stuff, which of course is cheaper than keeping a reporter in their employ.

But it’s not doomsday for all newspapers. On balance, the ultra-local community-type papers are doing fine. If the D-News and the trib figure that out (as have a few other dailies across the country), it could actually be good for PR.

Comment on July 10th, 2008.

With the essential dissolve of the business section in the Deseret News, I wonder if this will open the doors for another business publication to enter the market. Last year I was talking to a business journal that was one of 20 owned be the same publisher, and they acted like they were interested in the Salt Lake market. For us PR folks, I sure hope another local business pub emerges because I don’t see the number of Utah companies shrinking soon.

Comment on July 11th, 2008.

Clay:

I too would love to see another business pub in the Utah marketplace, particularly a weekly. I’m just not sure the advertisers will support another biz weekly, which make this another “chicken & egg proposition.”

Comment on July 11th, 2008.

Paul:

One of the more interesting things the DNews has done lately is start “Mormon Times.” Great if you’re a Latter-day Saint, not so great if you’re not. Nevertheless, it’s a way to tap into a multi-million person readership just among the English-speaking/reading population. And if they can get it into other languages . . . well watch out.

Here again, however, the BIG opportunity for the DNews and its owners is probably on the ‘Net and NOT in print.

Comment on July 11th, 2008.

Good question, JB. According to the Trib article, it too is downsizing, but doing so (for now) via attrition — people retiring, taking new jobs, etc. — and then not replacing the departed ones. Then again, the Trib has nearly twice the circluation with roughly the same size editorial staff. Hence, I suspect the Trib is a lot leaner than the Deseret News.

Comment on July 14th, 2008.

Deseret News cited a decrease in employment ads as one of the reasons for the layoffs. KSL.com might have been one of the reasons for that decrease. About two months ago I was on KSL.com and saw that they were cutting off the employment ads.

Leave a comment

TheBettyFactor.com is intended to discuss marcomm topics as well as highlight the best and critique the worst of marketing communications. It’s meant as a dialogue to raise the standards of the industry. In that light, here are the few, simple policies for commenting on this blog:
  • Keep it clean: No profane, vulgar, suggestive or obscene language, please. We’re communicators here. That kind of language just shows a lack of professionalism.
  • Keep it civil: Be polite and sensitive to others. Insulting or slandering anyone, directly or indirectly, will not be tolerated.
  • Keep it applicable: This blog has a purpose: a discussion of the best and worst in marketing communications to increase the standards of the profession. Please stick to it.
Other than that, let’s have a conversation.

Names and email addresses are required (email addresses aren't displayed), url's are optional.

Comments may contain the following xhtml tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>