What Clients Want

Posted on June 19th, 2008 @ 13:10 pm by Hawk.
Categories: Public Relations.

I’ve learned a few things in my six-year career in PR. But the biggest thing I’ve learned is what clients want. It’s a not-so-secret secret that every PR professional needs to understand or they will be doomed.

The lesson is this: What have you done for me lately?

When companies hire a PR firm, they expect results, and not just one-time results. They expect regular results. With few exceptions, that means ink. Ink by the barrel, if you will.

Essentially in PR, that’s our bottom line. We have to generate results for our clients. Most of the time, we are successful at it. But it kind of stops there.

I had a great mentor when I worked at Edelman who taught me a very important lesson about the next step. She pulled me aside one day because she received an email about a news story we had pitched and placed. The problem was, she received it from the client. She told me, “Never let that happen.”

There’s a great post on PRSA’s blog about 5 Tips on Working with Reports and Top News Stories. The last point mentioned in the post is the most striking point of all. It basically says, “Were you successful? Find the story.”

Make sure you are the one to inform the client that the story ran. Keep a record of those hits. And keep trying to get them as often as possible.

That’s what your clients want.

Answers to PR Questions from a Tech Start-up CEO

Posted on June 13th, 2008 @ 11:53 am by David Politis.
Categories: Media Relations, Public Relations.
answers-to-pr-questions-from-a-tech-start-up-ceo

Part of the agency business is that you’re always looking for new clients. It’s been that way since January 1984 when I started my first “professional” job in public relations at Tycer-Fultz-Bellack in Palo Alto, California in the heart of Silicon Valley and it hasn’t changed since.

So this morning I got a set of insightful questions about PR from the CEO of a Web-based tech company located in Utah.

Given that The Betty Factor is focused on all issues marketing related, I figured why not share some of those questions and my answers here?

So (without disclosing the name of the exec or the company), here goes.

1.   Not all visibility or efforts can be quantified, but I need to do my best to quantify the PR efforts.  I read a bit on your website(s) last night.  I read the blog on A, B and C press releases.  I would initially categorize my info as B news.  First, is my estimate accurate and secondly, on average what percentage of publishers take one of your releases and publish something based on that release?  (I am only looking for an average and know that I may be below average.)

Answer to Question No. 1:

Categorizing news releases as having “A,” “B” or “C” importance is helpful and is a good way to look at announcements. However, because we’re speaking about sending news releases out to a large number of media outlets, the true answer is that some media outlets will view the “Xxxxxxxxxxxx” release as a “C” announcement, others as a “B,” and perhaps a few as an “A” announcement. In other words, it depends.

That’s also often true of different journalists within the same media outlet. For example, a Products Reporter/Editor might be quite interested in a new product announcement, while a Feature or News Reporter/Editor may not. Again, it depends.

 2.  Given the fact that USA Today just wrote an article on this same subject (the market that this company works in), what is the power of the story a week later, or a month later?  Are smaller publications avoiding “rehashing” of stories on publications like USA Today?  Do we need a stronger or fresher angle?

    

Answer to Question No. 2:

    

Typically yes, journalists like to be the first one to “break” a story; media outlets too. However, last time I checked, USA Today has a print circulation of close to 3.5 million; online they probably reach another 30 million. But out of these, maybe 10 percent will have actually seen/read the story.

    

That means that there’s probably another 200 million or so other adults in the U.S. who did not see the story. For this reason, we believe your story still has legs, both now and in the future.

    

Do other, smaller publications avoid “rehashing” a USA Today story? Actually, some of them will reprint it verbatim. But many will not.

    

3.  We are discussing a a range of $6-$7K (for an initial project).  In the initial phase, would it benefit me exponentially to increase that to $10k?  In other words, for $6k I will see (x) but for $10k, I will see 5(x).  Or is it better to see the $6k result and then duplicate it with another $5k in 6 months?  What is the best short term strategy?

    

Answer to Question No. 3:

    

Don’t get me wrong. If a client or prospective client wants to spend more money, we’re not opposed to that. However, I’m not convinced that spending more money today on PR beyond what we’re currently recommending is going to generate dramatically more media coverage for you.

    

Unless someone/a company has invented/created something that is truly the “next best thing since sliced bread,” something that truly warrants a blow ‘em out, rock ‘em, sock ‘em, no holds barred, pedal to the metal PR campaign, my experience is that an aggressive but steady publicity campaign works the best.

You’re better off to get on the journalists’ (and bloggers) radar screens. Treat them professionally, Act like you know what you’re doing. Only send them real news (and ideas). Be an expert. Make their professional lives easier.

    

In other words, make them aware of you and turn them into converts — battle-hardened/skeptical journalists who become converted to the idea that your company is in fact one of the best online solutions (in your marketplace).

    

That’s what we do for our clients: We help them stand out in an overcrowded media world with the right positioning and messaging delivered to the right journalists (and bloggers) in the right manner at the right time.

    

= = = = = = = = = =

 

DISCLOSURE: A few clarifying points were added to the original text of my email answers.

 

Obama:Trek:Ultimate Product Placement

Posted on June 10th, 2008 @ 13:13 pm by Ms. Lansford.
Categories: Public Relations.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. I know that I already did a post recently on product placement in the wildly popular TLC show, Jon and Katie+Eight. However, I couldn’t pass up the opportunity to throw a little love to our friends at TREK when I saw today’s photo of Barack Obama in the Boston Herald story Nerdy Bike Image Won’t Tank Obama.

Beyond the high visibility of the product for TREK, I imagine Obama’s bike love will only help him better raise funds at this week’s Bike Industry Fundraiser hosted by SRAM co founder and executive vice prez F.K. Day this Thursday in Chicago (announced today on industry media site Bicycle Retailer.com).

Other important folks who will be in attendance at the fundraiser are Trek’s John Burke (surprise), Specialized’s Mike Sinyard, Cannondale Sports Group’s Jeff Frehner, Fuji’s Patrick Cunnane, Raleigh’s Steve Meineke, QBP’s Steve Flagg, Chris Fortune from Saris as well as Tim Blumenthal from Bikes Belong and IMBA’s Mike Van Abel.

Obama Sporting his super cool TREK in today\'s Boston Herold

It’s a Question of Ethics

Posted on June 4th, 2008 @ 7:30 am by Bacon.
Categories: Ethics, Public Relations, Publicity.

I was very happy to see PRSA finally respond to the recent controversy involving Scott McClellan–the former White House press secretary who just released his book that includes, among other controversial acknowledgments, his confessions about knowingly lying to the press corps on behalf of the president on more than one occasion.

First of all, with all the political mumbo-jumbo ongoing right now, my personal opinion is that once a liar always a liar. I’m not saying you can’t change if you lied in the past, but I am saying that we don’t have to believe you ever again. Think of it as the “fool me once” principle.

How can McClellan expect anyone to know he is telling the truth now, and not just trying to capitalize on the current animosity towards Bush and politicians in general? As a student of public relations (PR), he knows that playing on trends makes for a much more compelling story than if he launched his book a year after being asked to resign. Oh, did I just say he was (allegedly) asked to resign? If he was indeed asked to resign his credibility is even less than moot. But I digress.

His actions and those of other questionable PR professionals inspired me to write a little about the ethics of PR work, especially as it relates to Web 2.0.

(more…)

McClellan, the Disenfranchised Flack

Posted on June 3rd, 2008 @ 9:10 am by Beldin.
Categories: In the News, Public Relations, Writing.

Editorial Cartoon from Slate

With the McClellan issue still in the press, I couldn’t resist when Bacon sent me this cartoon.