“Experts” Generate Greater Media Coverage

Posted on November 27th, 2007 @ 8:54 am by David Politis.
Categories: Journalism, Politis Communications, Public Relations.

It’s always nice to see your name in lights (or be quoted within a story, as happened yesterday for me and Politis Communications with the KSL radio story on “Cyber Monday“).

The truth of the matter is that since I moved to Utah in 1987, I’ve made myself available to local reporters and media outlets as an expert on all things techology-related, someone who can simply and quickly explain the most technical subject for the average layperson. As a result, I’ve been used as a media resource throughout Utah — in print, on the airwaves and behind the scenes — for more than 20 years.

It can take some time to get to the point where journalists trust that you

  • really are a subject matter expert,
  • can string more than one cogent sentence together, and
  • that you are a reliable resource.

However, the benefits of becoming a trusted expert resource to media outlets are invaluable.

I’ll provide a specific list of action points in an upcoming post about how to become a trusted subject matter expert that journalists will call on again and again. And as a result, how you can generate greater media coverage than ever before.

1 comment.

Pingback on December 10th, 2007.

[...] Want Better Media Coverage? Become an Expert! Posted on December 10th, 2007 @ 0:43 am by David Politis. Categories: Media Coverage, Media Relations, PR, Subject Matter Experts.A couple of weeks ago, I wrote that “experts” generate greater media coverage. [...]

Leave a comment

TheBettyFactor.com is intended to discuss marcomm topics as well as highlight the best and critique the worst of marketing communications. It’s meant as a dialogue to raise the standards of the industry. In that light, here are the few, simple policies for commenting on this blog:
  • Keep it clean: No profane, vulgar, suggestive or obscene language, please. We’re communicators here. That kind of language just shows a lack of professionalism.
  • Keep it civil: Be polite and sensitive to others. Insulting or slandering anyone, directly or indirectly, will not be tolerated.
  • Keep it applicable: This blog has a purpose: a discussion of the best and worst in marketing communications to increase the standards of the profession. Please stick to it.
Other than that, let’s have a conversation.

Names and email addresses are required (email addresses aren't displayed), url's are optional.

Comments may contain the following xhtml tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>